Excerpt from spacedaily.com
For nearly half a century, theoretical physicists have made a series of
discoveries that certain constants in fundamental physics seem
extraordinarily fine-tuned to allow for the emergence of a life-enabling
universe.
Constants that crisscross the Standard Model of Particle Physics guided
the formation of hydrogen nuclei during the Big Bang, along with the
carbon and oxygen atoms initially fused at the center of massive
first-generation stars that exploded as supernovae; these processes in
turn set the stage for solar systems and planets capable of supporting
carbon-based life dependent on water and oxygen.
The theory that an Anthropic Principle guided the physics and evolution
of the universe was initially proposed by Brandon Carter while he was a
post-doctoral researcher in astrophysics at the University of Cambridge;
this theory was later debated by Cambridge scholar Stephen Hawking and a
widening web of physicists around the world.
German scholar Ulf-G Meibner, chair in theoretical nuclear physics at
the Helmholtz Institute, University of Bonn, adds to a series of
discoveries that support this Anthropic Principle.
In a new study titled “Anthropic considerations in nuclear physics” and
published in the Beijing-based journal Science Bulletin (previously
titled Chinese Science Bulletin), Professor Meibner provides an overview
of the Anthropic Principle (AP) in astrophysics and particle physics
and states: “One can indeed perform physics tests of this rather
abstract [AP] statement for specific processes like element generation.”
“This can be done with the help of high performance computers that allow
us to simulate worlds in which the fundamental parameters underlying
nuclear physics take values different from the ones in Nature,” he
explains.
“Specific physics problems we want to address, namely how sensitive the
generation of the light elements in the Big Bang is to changes in the
light quark mass m_q and also, how robust the resonance condition in the
triple alpha process, i.e. the closeness of the so-called Hoyle state
to the energy of 4He+8Be, is under variations in m_q and the
electromagnetic fine structure constant a_EM,” he adds.
Brandon Carter initially posited the theory: “The universe (and hence
the fundamental parameters on which it depends) must be such as to admit
the creation of observers within it at some stage.”
Stephen Hawking, expert on the Big Bang and cosmic inflation, extended
the dialogue on the Anthropic Principle in a series of papers and books.
In “A Brief History of Time,” he outlines an array of astrophysics
phenomena and constants that seem to support the AP theory, and asks:
“Why did the universe start out with so nearly the critical rate of
expansion that separates models that recollapse from those that go on
expanding forever, that even now, ten thousand million years later, it
is still expanding at nearly the critical rate?”
“If the rate of expansion one second after the Big Bang had been smaller
by even one part in a hundred thousand million million,” he explains,
“the universe would have recollapsed before it ever reached its present
size.”
Professor Ulf-G Meibner, in explaining his new groundbreaking study,
states: “The Universe we live in is characterized by certain parameters
that take specific values that appear to be remarkably fine-tuned to
make life, including on Earth, possible. “
“For example, the age of the Universe must be large enough to allow for
the formation of galaxies, stars and planets, and for second- and
third-generation stars that incorporated the carbon and oxygen
propagated by earlier exploding stars,” he says.
“On more microscopic scales, he adds, “certain fundamental parameters of
the Standard Model of light quark masses or the electromagnetic fine
structure constant must take values that allow for the formation of
neutrons, protons and atomic nuclei.”
And while the Big Bang Nucleosynthesis gave rise to hydrogen nuclei and
alpha particles (4He nuclei), elements widely regarded as essential to
life including carbon and oxygen were only produced later, inside
massive stars that burned bright and died quickly, some through a
supernova explosion that spread these elements to later generations of
star systems.
In one series of experiments involving intricate computer simulations on
JUQUUEN at Forschungszentrum Julich, Professor Meibner and his
colleagues altered the values of light quark masses from those found in
Nature to determine how great a variation would prevent the formation of
carbon or oxygen inside massive stars.
“Variations in the light quark masses of up to 2-3 percent are unlikely
to be catastrophic to the formation of life-essential carbon and
oxygen,” he concludes.
And earlier, during the Big Bang’s generation of the nuclei of first two
elements in the Periodic Table, he notes, “From the observed element
abundances and the fact that the free neutron decays in about 882
seconds and the surviving neutrons are mostly captured in 4He, one finds
a stringent bound on the light quark mass variations … under the
reasonable assumption that the masses of all quarks and leptons
appearing in neutron b-decay scale with the Higgs vacuum expectation
value.”
“Thus,” Professor Meibner states, “the Big Bang Nucleosynthesis sets
indeed very tight limits on the variations of the light quark mass.”
“Such extreme fine-tuning supports the anthropic view of our Universe,” he adds.
“Clearly, one can think of many universes, the multiverse, in which
various fundamental parameters take different values leading to
environments very different from ours,” Professor Meibner states.
Professor Stephen Hawking states that even slight alterations in the
life-enabling constants of fundamental physics in this hypothesized
multiverse could “give rise to universes that, although they might be
very beautiful, would contain no one able to wonder at that beauty.”
Professor Meibner agrees: “In that sense,” he says, “our Universe has a
preferred status, and this is the basis of the so-called Anthropic
Principle.”
Source Article from http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/AscensionEarth2012/~3/7znoczYDCBE/new-data-that-fundamental-physics.html
New data that fundamental physics constants underlie life-enabling universe
No comments:
Post a Comment