Sunday, 1 February 2015

New Religion and Science Study Reveals 'Post-Seculars' Reject Evolution







Excerpt from huffingtonpost.com


(RNS) Meet the “Post-Seculars” — the one in five Americans who no one seems to have noticed before in endless rounds of debates pitting science vs. religion.



They’re

more strongly religious than most “Traditionals” (43 percent of

Americans) and more scientifically knowledgeable than “Moderns” (36

percent) who stand on science alone, according to two sociologists’

findings in a new study.



“We were surprised to find this pretty

big group (21 percent) who are pretty knowledgeable and appreciative

about science and technology but who are also very religious and who

reject certain scientific theories,” said Timothy O’Brien, co-author of

the research study, released Thursday (Jan. 29) in the American

Sociological Review.



Put another way, there’s a sizable chunk of

Americans out there who are both religious and scientifically minded but

who break with both packs when faith and science collide.



Post-Seculars

pick and choose among science and religion views to create their own

“personally compelling way of understanding the world,” said O’Brien,

assistant professor at University of Evansville in Indiana.



O’Brien

and co-author Shiri Noy, an assistant professor of sociology at

University of Wyoming, examined responses from 2,901 people to 18

questions on knowledge of and attitudes toward science, and four

religion-related questions in the General Social Surveys conducted in

2006, 2008 and 2010.



Many findings fit the usual way the science-religion divide is viewed:





Moderns, who stand on reason, scored high on scientific knowledge and

scored lowest on religion questions regarding biblical authority and the

strength of their religious ties.



— Traditionals, who lean toward

religion, scored lower on science facts and were least likely to agree

that “the benefits of scientific research outweigh the harmful results.”



However,

the data turned up a third perspective – people who defied the familiar

breakdown. The authors dubbed them “Post-Secular” to jump past a

popular theory that Americans are moving way from religion to become

more secular, O’Brien said.



Post-Seculars — about half of whom

identify as conservative Protestants — know facts such as how lasers

work, what antibiotics do and the way genetics affect inherited

illnesses.



But when it comes to three main areas where science and

Christian-centric religious views conflict — on human evolution, the

Big Bang origin of the universe and the age of the Earth — Post-Seculars

break away from the pack with very significantly different views from

Traditionals and Moderns.



Areas where the factions are clear:




graphic

The universe began with a huge explosion:
Traditional: 21 percent

Modern: 68 percent

Post Secular: 6 percent

Human beings developed from earlier species of animals:
Traditional: 33 percent

Modern: 88 percent

Post-Secular: 3 percent

The continents have been moving for millions of years and will move in the future:
Traditional: 66 percent

Modern: 98 percent

Post-Secular: 80 percent

“Post-Seculars are smart. They know what

scientists think. They just don’t agree on some key issues, and that has

impact on their political views,” said O’Brien.


When the authors

looked at views on the authority of the Bible and how strongly people

said they were affiliated with their religion, Post-Seculars put the

most faith in Scripture and were much more inclined to say they were

strongly religious. And where science and faith conflict on hot-button

issues, they side with the religious perspective.



For example,

Moderns are the most supportive of embryonic stem cell research and

abortion rights for women, but Post-Seculars, who are nonetheless

largely positive about science and society, are more skeptical in both

areas, O’Brien said.



Candidates running in the 2016 elections might take note.



Where

people fall in these three groups can predict their attitudes on

political issues where science and religion both have claims, O’Brien

said, even after accounting for the usual suspects — social class,

political ideology or church attendance.




Source Article from http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/AscensionEarth2012/~3/K2FPBbycYME/new-religion-and-science-study-reveals.html



No comments:

Post a Comment