Tuesday 10 February 2015

Planck telescope puts new datestamp on first stars






Polarisation of the sky
Planck has mapped the delicate polarisation of the CMB across the entire sky





The team has made the most precise map of the “oldest light” in the cosmos.



Earlier observations of this radiation had suggested the

first generation of stars were bursting into life by about 420 million

years after the Big Bang.




Planck’s data indicates this great ignition was well established by some 560 million years after it all began.




“This difference of 140 million years might not seem that

significant in the context of the 13.8-billion-year history of the

cosmos, but proportionately it’s actually a very big change in our

understanding of how certain key events progressed at the earliest

epochs,” said Prof George Efstathiou, one of the leaders of the Planck

Science Collaboration.




Subtle signal

 

The assessment is based on studies of the “afterglow” of the

Big Bang, the ancient light called the Cosmic Microwave Background

(CMB), which still washes over the Earth today.




The European Space Agency’s (Esa) Planck satellite mapped this “fossil” between 2009 and 2013.



It contains a wealth of information about early conditions in

the Universe, and can even be used to work out its age, shape and do an

inventory of its contents.




Scientists can also probe it for very subtle “distortions”

that tell them about any interactions the CMB has had on its way to us.




Forging elements

 

One of these would have been imprinted when the infant cosmos underwent a major environmental change known as re-ionisation. 




It is when the cooling neutral hydrogen gas that dominated the

Universe in the aftermath of the Big Bang was then re-energised by the

ignition of the first stars.



These hot giants would have burnt brilliant but brief lives,

producing the very first heavy elements. But they would also have

“fried” the neutral gas around them – ripping electrons off the hydrogen

protons.




And it is the passage of the CMB through this maze of

electrons and protons that would have resulted in it picking up a subtle

polarisation.






ImpressionImpression: The first stars would have been unwieldy behemoths that burnt brief but brilliant lives




The Planck team has now analysed this polarisation in fine

detail and determined it to have been generated at 560 million years

after the Big Bang.




The American satellite WMAP, which operated in the 2000s,

made the previous best estimate for the peak of re-ionisation at 420

million years. 




The problem with that number was that it sat at odds with Hubble Space Telescope observations of the early Universe.




Hubble could not find stars and galaxies in sufficient

numbers to deliver the scale of environmental change at the time when

WMAP suggested it was occurring.




Planck’s new timing “effectively solves the conflict,” commented Prof Richard McMahon from Cambridge University, UK.




“We had two groups of astronomers who were basically working

on different sides of the problem. The Planck people came at it from the

Big Bang side, while those of us who work on galaxies came at it from

the ‘now side’. 




“It’s like a bridge being built over a river. The two sides do now join where previously we had a gap,” he told BBC News.




That gap had prompted scientists to invoke complicated

scenarios to initiate re-ionisation, including the possibility that

there might have been an even earlier population of giant stars or

energetic black holes. Such solutions are no longer needed.




No-one knows the exact timing of the very first individual

stars. All Planck does is tell us when large numbers of these stars had

gathered into galaxies of sufficient strength to alter the cosmic

environment. 




By definition, this puts the ignition of the “founding stars”

well before 560 million years after the Big Bang. Quite how far back

in time, though, is uncertain. Perhaps, it was as early as 200 million

years. It will be the job of the next generation of observatories like

Hubble’s successor, the James Webb Space Telescope, to try to find the

answer.






JWSTBeing built now: The James Webb telescope will conduct a survey of the first galaxies and their stars




line


The history of the Universe

 


Graphic of the history of time



  • Planck’s CMB studies indicate the Big Bang was 13.8bn years ago

  • The CMB itself can be thought of as the ‘afterglow’ of the Big Bang

  • It spreads across the cosmos some 380,000 years after the Big Bang

  • This is when the conditions cool to make neutral hydrogen atoms

  • The period before the first stars is often called the ‘Dark Ages’

  • When the first stars ignite, they ‘fry’ the neutral gas around them

  • These giants also forge the first heavy elements in big explosions

  • ‘First Light’, or ‘Cosmic Renaissance’, is a key epoch in history


line



The new Planck result is contained in a raft of new papers just posted on the Esa website. 



These papers accompany the latest data release from the

satellite that can now be used by the wider scientific community, not

just collaboration members.




Two years ago, the data dump largely concerned interpretations

of the CMB based on its temperature profile. It is the CMB’s

polarisation features that take centre-stage this time.


It was hoped that Planck might find direct evidence in the

CMB’s polarisation for inflation – the super-rapid expansion of space

thought to have occurred just fractions of a second after the Big Bang.

This has not been possible. But all the Planck data – temperature and

polarisation information – is consistent with that theory, and the

precision measurements mean new, tighter constraints have been put on

the likely scale of the inflation signal, which other experiments

continue to chase.


What is clear from the Planck investigation is that the

simplest models for how the super-rapid expansion might have worked are

probably no longer tenable, suggesting some exotic physics will

eventually be needed to explain it.


“We’re now being pushed into a parameter space we didn’t

expect to be in,” said collaboration scientist Dr Andrew Jaffe from

Imperial College, UK. “That’s OK. We like interesting physics; that’s

why we’re physicists, so there’s no problem with that. It’s just we had

this naïve expectation that the simplest answer would be right, and

sometimes it just isn’t.”




Source Article from http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/AscensionEarth2012/~3/3aKTc2JXhxY/planck-telescope-puts-new-datestamp-on.html



No comments:

Post a Comment