Monday, 30 March 2015

The Story of Human Evolution Now Challenged




Story of Human Evolution Challenged

Excerpt from newhistorian.com


The history of the evolution of early humans has been challenged.

Until now, one of the most dominant theories about our evolution claimed that our genus, Homo, had evolved from smaller early humans becoming taller, heavier and longer-legged. This process eventually resulted in Homo erectus, which was able to migrate out of Africa and colonise Eurasia.



Whilst we know that small-bodied H. erectus, averaging less than five

feet tall and weighing under 50 kilograms, were living in southern

Europe by 1.77 million years ago, the origin of the larger body size

associated with modern humans has been elusive.




The paucity of knowledge about the origins of larger members of the Homo

genus is primarily a result of a lack of evidence. Previous estimates

of body size had been based on well-preserved specimens which were easy

to assign a species to. Since these samples are rare and disparate in

terms of both space and time, little is known about geographical and

chronological variation in the body sizes of the early Homo.




A joint study between the Universities of Cambridge and Tübingen has

shown that increases in body size occurred thousands of years after H. erectus left Africa; this growth in Homo body sizes primarily took place in the Koobi Fora region in modern Kenya.




“The evolution of larger bodies and longer legs can thus no longer be

assumed to be the main driving factor behind the earliest excursions of

our genus to Eurasia,” said Manuel Will, co-author of the study which

has been published in the Journal of Human Evolution.




By using tiny fragments of fossil, the team were able to estimate our

earliest ancestors’ height and body mass. Their findings, rather

surprisingly, indicate a huge diversity in body size; this is

particularly surprising as the wide variation we see in humans today was

thought to be a relatively recent development.




“If someone asked you ‘are modern humans 6 foot tall and 70kg?’ you’d

say ‘well some are, but many people aren’t,’ and what we’re starting to

show is that this diversification happened really early in human

evolution,” said Dr Jay Stock, co-author of the study.




Stock and Will are the first scientists in 20 years to compare the

body size of humans from between 2.5 and 1.5 million years ago. They are

also the first to use fragmentary fossils – many as small as toes, none

longer than 5cm – to estimate body sizes.




By comparing measurements of fossils from sites in Kenya, Tanzania,

South Africa and Georgia, the researchers have revealed substantial

regional variation in the size of early humans. Groups who lived in

South African caves, for example, were 4.8 feet tall on average. Some of

the skeletons found in Kenya’s Koobi Fora region would have stood

nearly 6 feet tall, a height comparable to the average height of modern

British males.


“Basically every textbook on human evolution gives the perspective

that one lineage of humans evolved larger bodies before spreading beyond

Africa. But the evidence for this story about our origins and the

dispersal out of Africa just no longer really fits,” said Stock.




It appears that Stock and Will have rewritten the history of the

development of early humans; diversity has deep roots amongst the Homo genus.




Source Article from http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/AscensionEarth2012/~3/-JkvsYj4pNA/the-story-of-human-evolution-now.html



No comments:

Post a Comment