Sunday, 15 March 2015

Don't Blame the Devil Anymore: Is Temptation All in Your 'Syn' apse?




 


Excerpt from huffingtonpost.com




Lack of self-control is at the root of many personal and social ills,

from alcoholism to obesity. Even when we are well aware of the costs,

many of us are simply unable to curb our desires and control our

impulses. Indeed, so daunting is this psychological challenge that an

estimate four in every ten American deaths is attributed to self-control

failure of one kind or another.





Yet many other people do succeed

at self-regulation, all the time and seemingly with ease. Why is that?

Why, in the face of everyday temptation, do some individuals fail

miserably while others coast by unscathed?

 
Psychological

scientists have been puzzling over this problem for years, but the

answer remains elusive. Recently, researchers in the U.S. and Europe

have been taking a different approach. They have been trying to

integrate different disciplines, and different investigative strategies,

to see if this approach might illuminate the dynamics of desire and

self-control. Among those scientists is the University of Cologne’s

Wilhelm Hofmann, who with colleagues has been combining neuroimaging and

experience sampling, searching for brain markers that predict whether

people give in to their desires (or resist) in daily life. Hofmann

discussed some of this ongoing work this week in Amsterdam, at the first

International Convention of Psychological Science, a meeting organized

specifically to share such innovative cross-disciplinary research. 






It’s

difficult to study individual desire and self-discipline, because many

self-reports are biased and unreliable. To get around this obstacle,

Hofmann and his colleagues used an fMRI scanner to observe subjects’

brains as they viewed appetizing foods–desserts, fast foods, and so

forth. Specifically, they recorded neural activity in the volunteers’

nucleus accumbens, or NAcc, a region of the forebrain associated with

pleasure and reward. They also recorded neural activity in the inferior

frontal gyrus, or IFG, while volunteers were performing a self-control

task. The IFG plays an important part in inhibiting action.


The

scientists wanted to see if neural activity in these two brain regions

predicted actual desire and self-regulation in these volunteers’ daily

lives. So after the brain scanning was completed, the scientists gave

the subjects Blackberries, which they used for a week of experience

sampling: Each day, the scientists signaled the subjects every two

hours, or seven times a day, and had them complete a short survey. They

reported on any desires they might have experienced in the previous half

hour, the strength of those desires, their resistance to the desire,

and finally, whether they had given into the desire and eaten–and if

so, how much.



The idea was to see if neural markers for desire and

resistance, taken together, could identify individuals who are more

likely to give in to temptation to eat, hour by hour. And they did,

clearly. Neural reactivity in the NAcc in response to tempting snacks

and sweets–this brain activity significantly predicted the strength of

subjects’ desire for food, their failure to control their desires, and

even how much they ate. Additionally, those who recruited the IFG when

faced with a self-control task–these subjects were less likely to

succumb to temptation in daily life–and they also ate less.



These

findings demonstrate the importance of individual differences in how

people experience and respond to everyday temptation. These

differences–how well or poorly individuals exert control in the face of

temptation–appear to arise from brain mechanisms for both reward

processing and regulation of responses. It’s not just that people with

self-control problems respond abnormally to food cues, and it’s not just

that they fail to inhibit their actions–it’s apparently both. These

abnormalities–and their neural signatures–may very well underlie other

appetites and addictions, including binge drinking, compulsive gambling

and risky sex.



WrayHerbert is reporting this week from the first International Convention of Psychological Science in Amsterdam.




Source Article from http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/AscensionEarth2012/~3/ylBPb0b1cLY/dont-blame-devil-anymore-is-temptation.html



No comments:

Post a Comment