Sunday, 15 March 2015

What's Behind Harper's Hate Speech?



 



March 13, 2015


(Left, video describes climate of hate created by Stephen Harper.)

With an election in October, why

would Canadian
Prime Minister Stephen Harper deliberately alienate
a

million Muslim Canadians, a constituency
his party has assiduously courted in the past?




by Henry Makow Ph.D.



In Parliament Wednesday, Prime Minister Stephen Harper said he would pursue a ban on Muslim women wearing niqabs at citizenship ceremonies. While only a tiny minority of Muslims wear these garments, Harper went out of his way to insult all Muslims:


“Why would Canadians, contrary to our own values, embrace a practice at

that time that is not transparent,” he said,[one] “that is not open and, frankly, is

rooted in a culture that is anti-women?”


Niqab.jpg(left, niqab)


Muslims reacted with outrage. Harper’s statement implied they weren’t welcome as citizens, and Muslim women were too stupid to know their culture was “anti-woman.”  Harper contradicted Canada’s oft-stated protestations of “diversity” and multiculturalism.


Even though Harper pretends to be a Christian and social conservative, he seems ignorant of the religious purpose of the niqab. It’s a sign of the woman’s modesty and consecration to her family and religion.


As for “diversity,” Harper’s statement proves that it is a flexible excuse to promote certain people and polices at certain times.

For example, in Aug. 2013, in response to Quebec’s proposed “values charter,” Harper said, “And our job is social inclusion. Our job is making all groups who

come to this country, whatever their background, whatever their race,

whatever their ethnicity, whatever their religion, feel at home in this

country and be Canadians,” he said. “That’s our job.”



WHAT CHANGED?


Divide and conquer is the time-tested tactic of the Illuminati. Clearly Harper’s central banker masters have demanded he demonize Muslims in the eyes of gullible Christians. Harper staged a false flag terror event last October and is trying to shepherd an unpopular repressive new anti-terror bill through Parliament.


The video above shows that Harper’s comments come in the context of many anti-Muslim actions by his government.  It also shows the ineptness of the airhead Liberal leader Justin Trudeau who is incapable of understanding the niqab issue and capitalizing on it. 


Harper said, “almost all Canadians

oppose the wearing of face coverings during citizenship ceremonies.” He has calculated that his stand will win him more votes than not.


By calling Muslim culture “anti woman,” he is guilty of hate speech. He has displayed his ignorance and damaged his dubious cause. 



 Related -  Makow- The Truth About Diversity


Canadian defense minister tweets hoax photos from anti-Muslim hate sites:

 


First Comment from Dan:

shg.jpgHarper is such an arrogant pipsqueak in the video.   I watched the faces of the smug, self-righteous den of vipers around him.
The Sikh parliamentarian behind Harper on left in his blue turban is especially hypocritical – nodding his head snidely and applauding.


But it’s dialectical theater.  Harper doesn’t care about ‘women’ by singling out one group of them for abuse.


Hey maybe they could work out a compromise:  How about banning the Toronto PRIDE PARADE?







The Vigilant Citizen ad




Comments for “What’s Behind Harper’s Hate Speech?”



Mohammed in South Africa said (March 14, 2015):


It’s clear that lots of non Muslims (mostly whites from the west) don’t have much understanding of Islam or if they do, they are intentionally misleading others with stupid remarks/comments. ie- they are just trolls.


In response to Andrew, there’s a difference between HIJAB & NIQAB. Hijab is when the entire body is covered but the face is open & this is what the lady in Canada was wearing when the judge refused to hear her case. Niqab is when the face is covered & only the eyes are exposed.


In response to Sandra, Taqiyya is practiced ONLY by Shias, who are NOT Muslims, despite their claims that they are Muslim or many non Muslims’ taking them to be Muslims. There is a BIG difference between the fundamental beliefs of muslims & Shias.


What need is there to see the face of a woman walking in the street? and, according to Islam, a veiled woman is allowed to unveil in the presence of other females-irrespective of whether they are Muslims or not its only for strange males-those other than her father, brothers, uncles & sons that she needs to cover herself.


So, before people make comments which are visible to the entire world, they should ensure they know what they’re talking about.





Sally said (March 14, 2015):


Henry, re the ‘beat up’ about Muslim women’s dress – I notice nowhere in the west has there EVER been a condemnation of nuns’ traditional clothing. Yet what is the difference?


The difference is that Muslims and Christians are to be set against each as decided by the Globalists in the Hegelian manner of thesis – antithesis – synthesis ie divide and conquer (after weakening both sides significantly to make them pliable to the plan of a New World Order, with its occultic ‘a thousand points of light’ as George Bush smugly pronounced).


Fact is we’re all under attack by the secret societies (Jesuit controlled at its root – listening to Lauren Moret) and need to see through the farce of divide and conquer and the lies that fly out of the mouths so comfortably of psychopaths and their sycophantic, underling deviant personalities.





Sandra said (March 14, 2015):


First of all, I’m not a fan of Harper or all the other BS politicians and their machinations.



Magda said, “This is a choice that leaves our beauty firmly placed within the spheres of our family, our spouses and at parties with our female friends.”



That is taqqiya, Henry. Taqqiya is what they say for OUR consumption. It is not what is really going on.



You, Henry – place a mask/covering of any kind on your face and body and walk down the street or into a public building filled with people. How do you feel? I’ll tell you how I would feel: that I can size up all the non-veil-wearing public – but they don’t know who or what I am. That places me at a great advantage.



When little kids come to the door on Hallowe’en with their disguises, that doesn’t faze me. But when they are accompanied by an obvious adult also wearing a face and/or body covering, I am thoroughly creeped out. It may be the next door neighbor, but then maybe not…










CR said (March 14, 2015):


Looks like it’s time to move to Russia. The gay and lesbian thing was bad enough, but now drag queens and cross dressers are the latest fashion. I can’t think of any logical (benevolent) reason to promote this type of deviancy. The article you linked on the new clean & clear spokesman is disturbing, he started “transitioning” to female at 6 years old? What kind of parents are those? That sounds like child abuse to me. It’s like the old saying, give them an inch and they’ll ask for a foot. Once sodomy is legal then the doors are open to anything.





MM said (March 14, 2015):


It’s pretty simple, Harper’s owners see the writing on the wall, they know he’s done next election, so like a good NWO soldier he’s doing what he can to keep the “Us vs. Islam” dialectic going so Canadians will accept a police state in order to keep us safe from those “barbarous Muslims”.


I see each political party in the west as having their role to play in implementing the NWO agenda. The right wing parties do the war mongering, the left do the social engineering.


Harper has gone as far as they dare go right now for his side of the job, next it will be Trudeau’s turn to continue the war on the family, morals, ethics, etc. No matter who wins elections these days, we the people lose.





Andrew said (March 13, 2015):


Anti-mask laws date back to the 1920s when many southern US States passed Anti-Ku Klux Klan Laws. Klansmen whose members typically wore white linen hoods to conceal their identities were the targets but they were allied in other cases. Many US States and countries around the world passed and enforce no masks laws during street demonstrations. These laws have proven difficult for DAs to prosecute and although arrests are sometimes made like at Occupy Wall Street, most charges were dropped.


I’ve travelled six Islamic countries. I’ve seen only a few veiled women in Istanbul during Ramadan. And only after the call to evening prayer. Never seen any in America.


I agree. What Harper said was anti-Islamic defamation calculated to inflame resentment against Islam in general.


Radical Islam was created by British Intelligence and subversive elements which created the Masonic Islamic Brotherhood in the 1890s. Today all so-called radical Islam is as phony as al-Qaeda and ISIS which were created by CIA and financed by US and UK Allies in the fraudulent WAR ON TERROR.


See Robert Dreyfuss’ DEVIL’S GAME (2005) pp. 1-50 about how CIA, MI6 and Mossad created all elements of so-called Fundamentalist Islam.





H said (March 13, 2015):


At times like this, countless Henry Makow essays come to mind — which have already established what Western Values are in reality! … Those women clapping behind Harper are the same dupes who l-o-v-e taking degradation as emancipation (and would naturally, now, want Muslim women to be just as degraded)! … A Freemasonic PM whose domestic and foreign policies are steeped in secrecy talks about “transparency” of other cultures?! … How exactly does Harper define “openness” … by allowing/ coercing everyone to be a lesbian like his wife or Kathleen Wynne?!


Someone should ask Harper what kind of value system makes a nation stage hoaxes, perpetrate lies, and arm/ fund fraudulent CIA/Mossad/CSIS/SIS/NATO mercenaries like ISIS to deface Islam! I guess “killing Islam” is the most profitable and top career-builder right now!


It’s clear why honorable men like Arthur Topham are facing jail-time for stating that “Canada is Hypocritical Nation”! I remember meeting an extraordinary man in Toronto, once, who approached me for a chat and then shared his life story. He told me that about 60 odd years ago, when he moved with his parents to Canada from the UK, he soon found that Canada was already morally dead! … Most certainly, the perceived “values” in a place depend on the central criteria and moral aptitude of the beholder. And ONLY God’s Revelations provide those central criteria/ standards, not the whims and ‘unspeak’ of ARROGANT Freemasons (false Zio-Judeo- Christian-West) who are out to destroy God Ordained Order!


And where are the likes of ADL and B’nai Brith to say anything about Harper’s abysmally shameful Hate Speech?! [Oh! Unless Talmudic “shamelessness” IS what Harper reckons to be the Canadian way/value?]





Richard E said (March 13, 2015):


Reference article: “What is behind Harper’s hate speech?” I got a better on, no Jew can wear the Yamaha (Bennie) at their citizenship swearing in..





Magda said (March 13, 2015):


Thank you for bringing up this important issue Henry. As a Muslim woman who wore the face veil for about a month a few years back it is offensive that the government would butt their nose in such a personal matte; it is a dialogue between myself and my inner spirituality. I began wearing the regular head covering back when I was 21 whilst in university and I remember telling a non Muslim friend on a bus on the way to my university about my decision.


What the heck is the Harper government doing interfering with our rights and choices. Who is he to dictate what is anti-woman and what is not. In fact his provincial faith based world view is definitely the only anti-woman or anti human thing we see. Whether he likes it or not we are a people who use Mary peace be upon her as a role model……..who wish to participate in society as woman who conduct ourselves with honor and modesty and that means deal with my mind and not my body.


This is a choice that leaves our beauty firmly placed within the spheres of our family, our spouses and at parties with our female friends. For Muslims, marriage is the only legitimate venue for sex and reproduction. A view that being civilized is based on how little or how much clothing someone wears is subjective…….a choice for the individual.

Having said that in our society we should all dress how we please and stop interfering with the rights of others giving them a message that they are ‘only free to look like us’. The Harper government with its crazy end time belief system is deliberately sowing discord among Canadians and this is definitely an Anti Christian endeavor, can you imagine Prophet Isa/Jesus peace be upon him endorsing such a view?


Here is a message for Harper and ilk back off ……..we Muslims await Prophet Jesus/Isa peace be upon Him as well and believe his coming will bring a reign of peace. It is Christian end timers like you who are being played by the Satanic ones to spread your hatred, carnage and destruction and yet if you believe this is the way to obtain God’s favor your are as deluded as your pay masters.





Henry Makow received his Ph.D. in English Literature from the University of Toronto in 1982. He welcomes your comments at







Source Article from http://henrymakow.com/2015/03/whats-behind-harper-hate-speech.html



No comments:

Post a Comment